Selected References related to Peer Evaluation of Teaching
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Anker.
Beckman, T. J. (2004, April). Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching. Academic Medicine, 79(4), 343-346.
Bernstein, D. (1996, June). A departmental system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching: A commentary on Cavanagh. Innovative Higher Education, 20(4), 241-247.
Bernstein, D., & Quinlan, K. M. (Eds.). (1996, Spring). The peer review of teaching [Special issue]. Innovative Higher Education, 20(4).
Boulmetis, J., & Dutwon, J. (2000). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chism, N. V. N. (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Creighton University School of Pharmacy. (2000). Initial on-line course review process (pp. 152-158). Omaha, NE.
Keig, L,& Waggoner, M. D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Pritchard, R. D., Watson, M. D., Kelly, K., & Paquin, A. R. (1998). Helping teachers teach well: A new system for measuring and improving teaching effectiveness in higher education. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Richlin, L., & Cox, M. (Eds.). (1995). Special focus: Evaluation of teaching [Special Issue]. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(3).
Weimer, M. (1990). Improving college teaching: Strategies for developing instructional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
University of Minnesota. (2006). Syllabus tutorial. Retrieved on May 13, 2015, from the University of Minnesota, Center for Teaching and Learning website
From Oregon State, an instrument
Boston College Peer Review of Teaching; Formative versussummative approaches, guidelines, and references for peer review
Websites
Michigan Community College Virtual Learning Collaborative
University of New Mexico Center for Teaching Excellence Web Page – Peer Review of Teaching Formative vs. Summative Peer Review and helpful links
University of New Mexico Center for Teaching Excellence Web Page – Peer Review of Teaching Formative vs. Summative Peer Review and helpful links
UMass Amherst iPeer Peer Evaluation Software. Web-basedsoftware for peers in team environments
University of Minnesota Center for Teaching and Learning
web page. Classroom observation instruments
University of Texas at Austin Peer Review of Teaching.
Information for developing a customized system of peer review
Michigan State University website, various levels and resources for the evaluation of online courses
Online Peer Evaluation Articles/Resources
"Making peer evaluations work in Online Learning"
Quality Online Evaluation Initiative (Illinois Online Network)
Quality Assurance Checklist
The Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP)
Online Course Development Guide and Rubric
Virtual Learning Collaborative
Exemplary Online Instruction
·
